15 May 2026 · 2 min read

Goal Setting for Transformational Change, Not Incremental Tweaks

Most goal-setting frameworks optimise for incremental improvement: slightly better than last quarter, slightly closer to the target. That’s fine for maintenance, but it rarely produces transformational change — the kind that shifts your trajectory rather than just your position on the same line.

Planning an ocean row forces a different approach, because incrementalism doesn’t work when the destination is 3,000 miles away and the only way there is under your own power. You define the destination first — a specific coastline, a specific window of weather — and then work backwards through everything that has to be true before you can leave: the training, the boat, the crew, the funding, the permits. Nothing about that plan is vague, and none of it is optional.

Coaching goals the same way changes what counts as a good goal in the first place.

Start from the destination, not the gap

Most goal-setting starts by looking at where you are and asking what’s slightly better. Start instead from where you actually want to end up, stated as specifically as a landfall — a role, a decision made, a way of operating — and then ask what has to be true along the way. The goal defines the plan; the current state doesn’t get a vote.

Make the goal specific enough to fail

A vague goal is comfortable because you can’t really fail at it. “Row across the Atlantic” only becomes real, and only becomes achievable, once it has a date, a route, and a boat. The same is true of a career goal or a leadership goal — specificity is what turns an intention into something you can actually plan against.

Build in the discomfort, don’t plan around it

Expedition plans assume things will go wrong — storms, equipment failure, days lost to bad weather — and build in the margin to absorb it rather than pretending it won’t happen. Transformational goals should do the same: expect the setback, plan the response, and don’t let the first bit of resistance be read as evidence the goal was wrong.

The goals that actually change your trajectory are rarely the comfortable ones. They’re the ones specific enough to hold you to account, and big enough to be worth the discomfort of getting there.

Want to put this into practice in your own leadership?